<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New NYT Application Offers Best of Print and Digital Worlds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danlawton.com/2009/05/12/newly-released-nyt-reader-offers-the-best-of-print-and-digital-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danlawton.com/2009/05/12/newly-released-nyt-reader-offers-the-best-of-print-and-digital-worlds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:19:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KirkH</title>
		<link>http://www.danlawton.com/2009/05/12/newly-released-nyt-reader-offers-the-best-of-print-and-digital-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>KirkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 01:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danlawton.com/?p=176#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&quot;for $15 bucks a month you can get it all.  It’s totally worth it.&quot;

I just installed it and I&#039;m failing to see how this technology couldn&#039;t be incorporated into a web page with Adobe Flash.  In fact, you could probably recreate most of this with pure CSS and a few RRS feeds from the Times.  

Adobe wants you to buy their AIR SDK and NYT wants you to buy a subscription.  How is this not just another cross-marketing ploy reminiscent of Spider-Man in a Happy Meal.  Where&#039;s the beef?

I appreciate innovation in news but selling it with terms like nostalgia seems a bit ironical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;for $15 bucks a month you can get it all.  It’s totally worth it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I just installed it and I&#8217;m failing to see how this technology couldn&#8217;t be incorporated into a web page with Adobe Flash.  In fact, you could probably recreate most of this with pure CSS and a few RRS feeds from the Times.  </p>
<p>Adobe wants you to buy their AIR SDK and NYT wants you to buy a subscription.  How is this not just another cross-marketing ploy reminiscent of Spider-Man in a Happy Meal.  Where&#8217;s the beef?</p>
<p>I appreciate innovation in news but selling it with terms like nostalgia seems a bit ironical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

